Click Here & Make this
Your Start Page!
Thank You!

Paul the Gnostic Ravenous Wolf

The Lies and Heresy of Paul of Tarsus

—  Page 11  —

Paul knew that fear is the worst enemy of any truth — and the best insulation for lies against any truth. So he used the stern admonition "beware". And coming to think of it, that is precisely your own problem with the Truth, Stephen. All, but most of all your last letter distills a thick irrational fear, which prevents you from looking at the Truth in the eye at any cost. It is not difficult for me to see that what is in your heart is something like this:

"If I yield to the evidence against Paul, his letters and those of his disciples would be proven false. But if that happens, then part of the New Testament would have to be eliminated! If I allow that to take place, then, the NT would be proven to be imperfect. But if the NT is proven not to be perfect in just one part, then it would necessarily lead to the unthinkable probability that other parts of it could also have to go bye-bye. And if that also occurs, then — horrors of horrors! — maybe Yeshua would have to go bye-bye too! Oh no, I would end up in Hell !!! I will never, never, let myself consider such "dangerous" evidences. I do not want to see them, or hear them, or anything. I will just try and forget them. Therefore, don't any one ever try to convince me with facts and evidences of any kind because my mind is completely made up and totally closed up. Goodbye evidences in Torah or not. Welcome my great 'apostle' Paul. Through you, my dear teacher of great and deep 'knowledge', shall I find my 'wisdom' and 'peace'."

Stephen, you are not the first neo-Nazarene that I have dealt with. I know exactly how your mind works. Whether you are, or not, sufficiently honest as to recognize as yours the above paragraph is another matter. But since your faith hangs from such a tenuous thread of dogma — and as we saw this faith cannot withstand any test of Truth — I realize that any effort on my part to show you the truth concerning the Ravenous Wolf of Tarsus would be unsuccessful. Only the Almighty could open your eyes — if so you ask Him with all sincerity.

Years ago I — and my family and my Christianized Jewish best friend — used to be where you are now. Then one day, while preaching about the value of the Truth, I was convicted by the meaning of my own words and I saw, for the first time in a clear way that I was operating under fallacies born out of a deep fear — the fear of being religiously wrong. Right there I publicly prayed with my utmost sincerity for all of us to receive Truth at any cost. And, boy, did we get it! The blinders fell from my eyes, as well as from those of my family and my best friend. Now reading the Scriptures came to be as doing it for the very first time — and still is like that after years of that prayer happening. The lies of Gentilizers like Paul and his minions became easily detectable. The Judaic truth freely shone out of the pages of the Jewish Scriptures and the words of Yeshua. All Christian/Paulinist false writings, interpolations, deceptions, misinterpretations and all kinds of manipulations came to be seen as what they truly are: tools of Satan for the deception and control of the majority. But, interestingly enough, only the bad books the NT — and the interpolations in the good ones — went bye-bye, Stephen. Certainly Christianity disappeared as the illusion that it is. So we corrected the mistake that our Sephardic ancestors had made by converting to Christianity and I and my family reconverted to Judaism. This way we got under the only Covenant under which Truth-seeking believers of Messiah should ever be. We came back home — to true Israel — because of following the Truth which eventually lead us to identify and discard all of Paul's lies and many subsequent Gentile imaginations.

Beware of the "False" Circumcision"

Here the satanic Ogre of Tarsus tried to completely nullify a current and working Covenant of the Almighty with the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and the former Gentiles who joint them by Circumcision. But to make sure that his malevolent intent is successful, he attempted to invalidate and eradicate the only true Sign of such Covenant, the Circumcision in the flesh. This is the reason why in Hebrew "Brit Milah" although usually translated only as "Circumcision" in reality means "Covenant of Circumcision." The Abrahamic Covenant is totally broken and invalidated if Circumcision in the flesh is ignored.

Genesis 17:13-14
¹³ One who is born in your house, or whoever is bought with your money, shall surely be circumcised. My Covenant shall be in your flesh as an EVERLASTING Covenant. ¹⁴ But an uncircumcised male who is not circumcised in the flesh of his foreskin, that person shall be cut off from his people. He has broken My Covenant."

Do you think that Satan would not love to see people ignoring this vital Mitzvah? Do you not think that he would not have eventually sent someone under his control to try and derail this essential Covenant Sign by means of some more or less clever wrong teaching, subtle fear of shame and/or more or less open threats of force? Well, Paul used those three. I know, must people do not see the threat of force because, to them, force can only mean physical abuse. But the threats of force used by Paul were spiritual, mental and emotional.

Galatians 1:8
⁸ But even if we, or an angel from Heaven, should preach to you a "gospel" contrary to what we have preached to you, he is to be accursed!

If that is not a violent statement, then I do not know what is it. Yes, Paul was the main Thug that Satan ever used against the Covenant of the Almighty and his People.

Something that Christians/Paulinist obviously do not grasp is the fact that every Covenant of Adonai always builds upon the previous ones — they never replace the previous ones, nor render them obsolete.

A Covenant is an official contract between two individuals who voluntarily agree with its stipulations. Among other requirements the extent, as well as the exclusivities and possible inclusions, of the Covenant are to be explicitly set in its clauses.

Both the Abrahamic Covenant and the subsequent Sinai Covenant declare their extent as being Eternal and Everlasting — that is without any possible end for any reason. In no part of these Covenants can we find any Article hinting that the breakage of one or all parts of the Covenant would ever cause their temporary cessation — much less their total annulment. According to the Conditions established in the Sinai Covenant, what an act of collective mutiny could cause would be a proportionally severe and long national punishment. In the same token, it was accorded the personal exclusion from the Covenant of those wicked individuals who would brake its main tenets on a blatant and continuing act of rebellion. But nothing is stipulated in them for the invalidation, cancellation, dissolution or termination of either Covenant. It was Paul and his followers who propagated such a fallacy, which obviously was concocted in Hell. Most certainly, there is no allocation whatsoever in any Covenant for such a thing as the "Dispensation of the Gentiles" or the "Era of the Gentiles" — which is how some Christian/Paulinist call the highly misleading "Replacement Theology" initiated by Paul.

In many ways Paul, the Greatest Impostor in history, subtly but constantly attacked these two currently binding Covenants of Elohim. In the following example, he totally ignores the Abrahamic one, which he considers totally worthless since it is that Covenant that excludes Gentiles like him and his followers. Then he becomes the first person in history to call the Sinai Covenant "OLD" — that is out-of-date, passé, gone, irrelevant, obsolete. Yes, Paul was the inventor of the Replacement Theology darling expression, "The Old Testament". Everything he invented was truly corrupt.

2 Corinthians 3:14
¹⁴ But their minds were hardened because until this very day, at the reading of the OLD Covenant, the same veil remains unremoved because it is removed in Christos.

Of course, the Jewish Scriptures prophesied — and Yeshua talked — about a New Covenant. But such a New Covenant is still in the future! The New Covenant in the Blood of Yeshua is yet to be enacted since its clauses have not yet even been clearly stated and proclaimed, much less officially agreed upon.

Jeremiah 31:31-37
³¹ "Behold, Days are coming," declares YHWH, "when I will make a New Covenant with the House of Israel and with the House of Judah, ³² not like the Covenant which I made with their fathers in the Day I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt — My Covenant which they broke, although I was a husband to them" — declares YHWH.
³³ "But this is the Covenant which I will make with the House of Israel after those Days," declares YHWH: "I will put My Torah inside of them, and on their heart I will write it. And I will be their Elohim, and they shall be My People. ³⁴ They will not teach again, each man his neighbor and each man his brother, saying, 'Know Adonai,' for they will all know Me — from the least of them to the greatest of them," declares YHWH, "because I will forgive their iniquity, and their sin I will remember no more."
³⁵ Thus says YHWH, Who gives the sun for light by day and the fixed order of the moon and the stars for light by night, Who stirs up the sea so that its waves roar (YHWH of Hosts is His Name): ³⁶ "If this fixed order departs from before Me," declares YHWH, "Then the offspring of Israel also will cease from being a nation before Me forever." ³⁷ Thus says YHWH, "If the heavens above can be measured and the foundations of the earth searched out below, then I will also cast off all the offspring of Israel for all what they have done," declares YHWH.

If we read the chapter from its beginning — or at least verses 16-21 — we can easily realize that the time frame for the New Covenant is not the 1st century CE when Yeshua was in Israel, but the Messianic Kingdom! This is the time immediately after the coming of Messiah and the Wedding of the Lamb with his eternal Bride, Israel. The Wedding of the Lamb is precisely the New Covenant!

Every wedding implies an official contract which stipulates clear clauses to which each person agrees voluntarily. The Covenant that was agreed and enacted at Sinai was the ceremony of Engagement between Elohim and Israel. The Covenant that was established before between Adonai and Abraham was the Contract between two Fathers who before the Engagement Ceremony agreed in marrying their Children. Now, please, pay attention because this means that if you are not a child of Abraham, you cannot be an active Participant of the Wedding of the Lamb — only an invited guest, if at all. Now, you can become part of the Children of Abraham by coming as a child under his Tent by obeying the clause of true Circumcision in the flesh and observing the Mitzvot in both Covenants. So, why being a guest if you can be part of the marrying Bride? Remember it is not the guests, but only the Bride who enters into the Wedding Chamber (i.e. the Sacred City, New Jerusalem) to experience total happiness.

What the Jewish teachers were telling to the Gentiles in Asia Minor was things like these. They were asking them to become part of the Bride of Israel, so that Yeshua would have anything to do with them — now or later on. But Paul in his arrogant disposition and wicked intent wanted to completely sever the Gentiles from such an eternal Opportunity. And he did it by offering them an "easy" but false way based upon his heretic "assumptions" and "presuppositions" which would have them spiritually paralyzed in their "wishful thinking" and "false expectations".

Therefore, the claim of Paul the Destructive that Jews are the "evil workers" of a "false circumcision" is a complete and mortal falsehood which is still carried on this day by the hellish wind of dark Ignorance.

Despite whatever Paul and his ignorant followers may scream, the fact of the Scriptural matter is that the legal Children of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are the only ones under the blessing of the Covenants of the Almighty. How can this good teaching of the Judaizing Jews in Paul's times be "false" when the FACT is that YHWH Himself said that the Covenant was to be ONLY and FOREVER with the Patriarchs' descendants? And worse yet, how can the people under the Covenant be the "false circumcision"? I can see that some components of the Jewish nation have been/are spiritually rotten and even cut from the Covenant (in accordance to the Covenant). But there is a long way from recognizing that to say that the True Circumcision (i.e. Israel) is the "false circumcision". Let us see what Torah has to say about that bogus accusation of Paul. But while reading, keep in mind that Torah unmistakably establishes that if an alleged "prophet" says just ONE thing wrong during his alleged "prophecy", he is to be regarded as a "false prophet" and immediately executed by lapidation. Having said that, let us read now.

Genesis 17:7-13
⁷ "I will establish My Covenant between Me and you and your descendants after you throughout their generations for an EVERLASTING Covenant, to be Elohim to you and to your descendants after you.
⁸ I will give to you and to your descendants after you, the land of your sojournings, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession. And I will be their Elohim."
⁹ Elohim said further to Abraham, "Now as for you, you shall keep My Covenant, you and your descendants after you throughout their generations.
¹⁰ This is My Covenant, which you shall keep, between Me and you and your descendants after you: Every male among you shall be circumcised. ¹¹ And you shall be circumcised in the flesh of your foreskin, and it shall be the Sign of the Covenant between Me and you. ¹² And every male among you who is eight days old shall be circumcised throughout your generations — one who is born in the house, or who is bought with money from any foreigner, who is not of your descendants [ Gentiles ]. ¹³ One who is born in your house, or who is bought with your money, shall surely be circumcised [ Repetition means importance ]. My Covenant shall be in your flesh as an EVERLASTING Covenant. ¹⁴ But an uncircumcised male who is not circumcised in the flesh of his foreskin, that person shall be cut off from his people. He has broken My Covenant."

In view of the clear and repeated Articles of this Covenant, what "false circumcision" is the one Paul was talking about? You might try to explaine such a blatant contradiction; nut why trying to make a circus act by attempting to accommodate a square inside a circle? Why not accepting evident truth? How can the love for the filthy lies of a man surpass the Love for the Perfect Truth of the Highest One?

In front of the clarity of this passage opposing the blunt declarations of Paul of Tarsus, some unavoidable questions arise:

• Who, when and where declared the Everlasting Covenantal Circumcision in the flesh is to be annulled and therefore "false"?
• In what language does the word "uncircumcised" mean "true circumcision"?
• On the other hand, since when "EVERLASTING" does not mean FOREVER, but "until Yeshua comes"?

Reality is that YHWH and Paul cannot be both right on this vital issue. Then, who is the lair, Stephen, YHWH or Paul? Now, this is a most serious question which demands an honest, direct and truthful answer.

Galatians 5:3-6
³ And, again, I testify to every man who receives Circumcision, that he is under obligation to keep the whole Law. ⁴ You have been severed from Christos, you who are seeking to be justified by Law! You have fallen from Grace! ⁵ Because we through the Spirit — by faith [ gnosis ] — are waiting for the hope of righteousness. ⁶ For in Iesous Christos neither circumcision nor uncircumcision means anything, but [ gnosis ] faith working through love.

Well then, does Circumcision in the flesh mean something really big or nothing at all? According to Paul it is something eternally damaging. But according to Adonai it is vital to the point of its lack causing people to be eternally cut off from the Covenant with the Almighty. Now, who are we to believe Almighty, All Knowing HaShem the King of Heaven or a mere man? Without any doubt, Satan wants to prevent men from Circumcision in the flesh as to have them cut from the Chosen People, and so eventually prevent them from participating in the Wedding of the Lamb, and subsequently entering through the Pearly gates into the Heavenly City of New Jerusalem. This is why I say with good old Josh:

Joshua 24:14-15
¹⁴ Now, therefore, fear YHWH and serve Him in sincerity and Truth. And put away the gods which your fathers served beyond the River and in Egypt, and serve YHWH. ¹⁵ And if it is disagreeable in your sight to serve YHWH, choose for yourselves today whom you will serve: whether the gods which your fathers served which were beyond the River, or the gods of the Amorites in whose land you are living. But as for me and my house, we will serve YHWH.

And certainly you cannot serve HaShem the Paul way, but only the HaShem Way, which also was the Yeshua way.

Do you want to be righteous? Do you want to live in the Sacred City forever? Then remember that there are requisites for it. These are the very requisites that Paul the False Prophet of Tarsus told his followers to forget about them, so that they would loose the right to enter into the Presence of the Highest One, blessed be his sacred Name forever.

Revelation 22:14-15
¹⁴ Blessed are those who wash their robes, so that they may have the right to the Tree of Life, and may enter by the Gates into the City. ¹⁵ Outside are the "dogs" [ Gentiles, the uncircumcised ] and the sorcerers and the immoral persons and the murderers and the idolaters, and everyone who loves and practices lies. [ What lies? Whose lies? ]

Opposite to what Paul said, no uncircumcised Gentile — i.e. no rebellious Jew nor any foreigner or stranger to the Covenant — shall enter into that Sacred City. Now, ask yourself these questions:

Why do you think the Sacred City has High Walls?

Why do you think the Sacred City has Strong Gates?

Why do you think each Gate has the name of one of only the Children of Israel?

Why do you think there no such thing as a "Gentile Gate"?

The avoidance of answering these questions, or answering them incorrectly, may lead to serious consequences — the kind of eternal proportions. Please, set aside any "assumption" or "presupposition" and see what Truth comes out of the answers.

Revelation 21:9-12
⁹ Then one of the seven angels who had the seven Bowls full of the seven last plagues came and spoke with me, saying, "Come here, I will show you the Bride, the Wife of the Lamb." ¹⁰ And he carried me away in the Spirit to a great and high Mountain, and showed me the Sacred City, Jerusalem, coming down out of Heaven, from Elohim, ¹¹ having the Glory of Elohim. Her brilliance was like a very costly stone, as a stone of crystal-clear jasper. ¹² It had a great and high Wall, with twelve Gates, and at the Gates twelve angels; and names written on them, which are the names of the twelve Tribes of the sons of Israel.